[asterisk-users] Discussion: Are we ready to leave 1.4 behind?

[Ernie Dunbar]

> On 29/04/11 5:06 AM, Ira wrote:
>> At 05:56 AM 4/28/2011, you wrote:
>>> If I can install 1.8 and
>>> know that I can "turn off" things to get to 1.4 "solidness", then I
>>> don't
>>> have a problem with this kettle of fish. BTW, where does 1.10 fit into
>>> this
>>> conversation?
>>
>> Personally, 1.8 has never lasted more than 12 hours on my box without
>> dying and once I figured out how it dies, every beta and every release
>> will fail within moments if I followed the same very short test script.
>> I did put up a bug report on the problem once and was told within
>> moments it wasn't a bug, but I'm not smart enough to understand what I'm
>> supposed to do to troubleshoot and the same configuration has always run
>> on 1.2, 1.6 and 1.10 so from my perspective, it's a bug.
>
> What's the URL to the bug you submitted?
>
> I'm running 1.8 here 24/7 with no problems other than the ones that Alec
> Davis fixed.  I've got it running in I think 4 installations and we're
> not getting any core dumping or anything - obviously I'm only using a
> subset of the full functionality and most modules are not included.

What features do you have disabled? It would be helpful to know this for
future 1.8 implementation, although right now we can't quite use it yet.