[asterisk-users] Update the LCD with the callee's name after dialing

[Ryan Wagoner]

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:26 PM,  <unserossi at aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Wagoner <rswagoner at gmail.com>
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Thu, Jul 1, 2010 6:19 pm
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Update the LCD with the callee's name after
> dialing
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:52 AM,  <unserossi at aol.com> wrote:
>> Thanks a lot.
>>
>> Applying the patch gives me a
>>
>> Hunk #5 failed at 9881
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ryan Wagoner <rswagoner at gmail.com>
>> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>> <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
>> Sent: Thu, Jul 1, 2010 5:37 pm
>> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Update the LCD with the callee's name after
>> dialing
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:29 AM,  <unserossi at aol.com> wrote:
>>> Sounds great.
>>>
>>> Could you please give me a hint how to install the patch?
>>> Sorry for my stupid question but I'm a newbie to Asterisk.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ryan Wagoner <rswagoner at gmail.com>
>>> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>>> <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
>>> Sent: Thu, Jul 1, 2010 5:06 pm
>>> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Update the LCD with the callee's name after
>>> dialing
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Doug Lytle <support at drdos.info> wrote:
>>>> Ryan Wagoner wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> together one for 1.4 that compiles. I'll post both to the list
>>>>> hopefully later today.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you!
>>>>
>>>> Doug
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>
>>> The Asterisk 1.6.1.20 and 1.4.33.1 patches are almost identical. Both
>>> compile but need to be tested to verify that they work. I have the
>>> 1.6.2.9 version in production and plan to put the 1.6.1.20 version in
>>> sometime this weekend.
>>>
>>> In you are just using Asterisk in the dialplan you can set the called
>>> remote party id with something like below. Otherwise check out the
>>> previous FreePBX 2.7 patch.
>>>
>>> exten =>
>>>
>>>
>>> 100,1,SIPCalledRPID(${SIPPEER(${EXTEN}:callerid_name)},${SIPPEER(${EXTEN}:callerid_num)})
>>>
>>> Ryan
>>
>> If you installed Asterisk from source you just need to patch and
>> recompile / install.
>>
>> cd asterisk-version
>> patch -p1 < ../asterisk-verson-called-
>> rpid.patch
>> make install
>>
>> Otherwise if your using trixbox, etc you would probably want to grab
>> their SRPMS, add the patch to the spec file, and rebuild them. However
>> that is outside of the scope of this mailing list.
>>
>> Ryan
>
> Which version of Asterisk? The patches were made against the latest
> releases. If you are running an earlier version you might need to
> manually patch your install.
>
> Ryan
>
> --
>
> Version 1.6.1.20
>
> But it was my individual problem. Installing from scratch solved the
> patching issue.
>
> Now the application SIPCalledRPID is active and gets executed but i still
> don't get the name of the called person
>
> on my display. Maybe this is client dependent? I am using 3CX Softphone. Or
> is somethins else missing?
>

The client needs to support the Remote-Party-ID SIP header. If you
want to verify the header is being added run tcpdump and analyze it
with Wireshark. I know that Polycom phones have support for this. I
just put a modified version of the Asterisk 1.6.1 patch into
production for 25 Polycom phones, soon to be 150 phones. I changed the
return -1 to return 0 so that the call continues even if they
SIPCalledRPID args are invalid.

Ryan