[asterisk-users] {top|bottom|interleaved} posting, once again

Erik de Wild: Tripple-o info at tripple-o.nl
Sat Feb 6 15:29:13 CST 2010


Funny that a small matter like top | bottom | interleaved posting can  
lead to a situation that is referred to as "a fight" .  I agree with  
Ira that keeping all the original lines in place is very annoying when  
there are more lines then needed to pick up the discussion.  I seem to  
be a top poster by nature, it never crossed my mind that this could be  
part of  "a fight" or be annoying to others . Sometimes I interleave  
but I never post at the bottom. Lets take our bits of freedom and  
consider how to post (not, top, bottom or interleave) as part of our  
personal style of communicating ;-)

erik


On 6 feb 2010, at 22:04, Ira wrote:

> At 11:17 AM 2/6/2010, you wrote:
>> Actually bottom-posting without trimming anything (SCNR) is about as
>> annoying as top-posting.
>> Interleaved posting is fine, quoting just enough text so everyone
>> can understand the context.
>
> Seems to me if you trim so that only the minimum amount is left it
> hardly matters. I don't know about everyone else, but I've already
> read all the prior posts and only need the smallest bit of reference
> to connect the answer in my mind. I never read bottom posts that are
> more than 20 lines from the top unless I figure there's a reason I
> need to. Life is just to short.
>
> Ira
>
>
> -- 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list