[asterisk-users] ooh323 and h323

[Dovid Bender]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tony Mountifield" <tony at softins.clara.co.uk>
To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:13
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] ooh323 and h323


> In article <F43E89E805474ECDBDE144AF654E82E5 at BenderD>,
> Dovid Bender <asteriskusers at dovid.net> wrote:
>> Stay away form ooh323. It tends to crash Asterisk.
>
> Much better to use it and fix any bugs that make Asterisk crash.
> If everyone stays away from it, they will never get found and fixed.
>
> IME, ooh323 is much leaner and cleaner than the other two H323
> implementations, as it doesn't rely on external libraries of
> specific versions, and doesn't have a load of C++ stuff to call
> them.
>

 I would love for some one to fix it. Not sure how many people out there 
really know h323 and code in C.