[asterisk-users] Dialplan step that I do not have

[Jim Dickenson]

I have a context [dorecord] with _*99XX as an extension. I also have context
[phone-sets] with _*X. as an extension. Then there is a context that
includes phone-sets then dorecord.

When I dial extension *9901 the single step in phone-sets's _*X. extension
overwrites the first step in dorecord's _*99XX extension and it takes a
while to figure out why *9901 is not doing what the dialplan says to do.

The "fix" as to include phone-sets after dorecord.

Boy is asterisk a FUN piece of software ;)

Thanks Steve for the pointer.

I had no idea that asterisk would take one extension and overlay part of
another one with it. I guess I thought that extensions were discrete units.
-- 
Jim Dickenson
mailto:dickenson at cfmc.com

CfMC
http://www.cfmc.com/




From: Stephen Davies <stephen.l.davies at gmail.com>
Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:38:49 +0200
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Dialplan step that I do not have



2009/7/21 Jim Dickenson <dickenson at cfmc.com>
 
> 
> How can the first step of the extension be a playback when I do a verbose?
> 
 

Because you have a "exten =>" line that matches *9901 in the empl context or
some context that is included into the empl context "before" (above)
dorecord.

Steve



_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090721/712cfed6/attachment.htm