[asterisk-users] What is the best way to share extension state

[Jim Dickenson]

It does which is why it was not included in a release code set. The patch
could be changed to do an OR type compare for the bridge class. I have
changed my implementation to use only user events for everything that I now
need so I did not pursue this patch.
-- 
Jim Dickenson
mailto:dickenson at cfmc.com

CfMC
http://www.cfmc.com/



> From: Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet at amorsen.dk>
> Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:32:11 +0200
> To: Jim Dickenson <dickenson at cfmc.com>
> Cc: Asterisk User MailList <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Subject: Re: What is the best way to share extension state
> 
> Jim Dickenson <dickenson at cfmc.com> writes:
> 
>> http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14595 has a patch to add a new class,
>> bridge, so you get less events in AMI. This is for 1.6.0.x. It will give you
>> an idea of what needs to be changed in order to make the call class of
>> messages more granular.
> 
> It's nice to see that work is done to make it more granular. However,
> doesn't that break backwards compatibility, in the people who request
> call now don't get bridge events?
> 
> The challenge is that eventually every single manager_event will have
> its own type...
> 
> Anyway, that's a worry for another time. It's really neat!
> 
> 
> /Benny
>