[asterisk-users] Please help test the gender detection moduleat 575-613-4392

Wed Feb 18 18:14:17 CST 2009

I hadn't even thought of that, but that's a great idea. I wrote some code that does speech recognition based on generated tokens and no learning needed. We could certainly apply the gender detection and that sr to a project like this. I would store only the token in my current model, but we could store voice too.

I'll send you another email with my contact info. Maybe we can talk offline and put something together this week? This would be really cool...voice auth and ID. Probably not too much work either.

Justin Newman
nt_jnewman at yahoo.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff LaCoursiere <jeff at jeff.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:01:15 
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Cc: <nt_jnewman at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Please help test the gender detection module
at 575-613-4392

Hi Justin,

How far is your work from being able to do speaker verification?  Not 
*identification* mind you, but being able to tell that a captured voice is 
the same as another that is stored...

Cheers,

j

On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Asterisk Asterisk wrote:

> Steve,
>
>> Tried to test and got "call could not be completed as dialed".
>
> Were you able to connect? If not, please try again. Call volume has been growing.
>
>> How about a moving stress variable that could be used as a lie detector
> of sorts or
>> just to measure how certain parts of a script, or certain
> questions may
>
> This is possible. Do you want to call or e-mail to discuss?
>
>
>> I guess to get a baseline, you would have to ask a few inert questions.
>
> Yes, I definitely need to do this and will probably add this in for the next release.
>
> Justin Newman
> nt_jnewman at yahoo.com
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Steve Totaro <stotaro at totarotechnologies.com>
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 10:57:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Please help test the gender detection module at 575-613-4392
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Steve Totaro <stotaro at totarotechnologies.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Asterisk Asterisk <nt_asterisk at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> This module detects gender and approximate age range. I'm working on getting it's accuracy to 80%+ on a consistent basis, after implementing filters to remove background noise and other artifacts.
>
> It's designed for a number of things. To start, I have several clients (primarily mobile content and servers providers) that want to profile and generate demographics of their users for selling advertising. They also want to understand their user base. Plus, some customers have found that male and female users tend to respond differently to different prompts, flows, etc. This helps in designing a system that meets needs of many different types of users.
>
> Of course, there are many other uses and I'm sure people can generate some cool ideas.
>
> Let me know how it works when you try the test number at 575-613-4392. Also, let me know if you have any interest in the module.
>
> Justin
>
> nt_jnewman at yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Ron Joffe <ron.joffe at gmail.com>
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Cc: Asterisk Asterisk <nt_asterisk at yahoo.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 11:05:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Please help test the gender detection module at 575-613-4392
>
> That's an interesting module.
>
> Care to elaborate on what you designed it for ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ron
>
>
>
>
> On Monday 16 February 2009 13:29, Asterisk Asterisk wrote:
>> I need your help: please help test the gender detection module at
>> 575-613-4392.
>>
>> I wrote a gender detection module and thought I'd try it out. It only takes
>> a second. I've been showing 90%+ accuracy and I want to make sure it's
>> working correctly. Rain and significant background noise seems to throw it
>> off, so I still have a bit of work to do.
>>
>> Have your friends and significant others call too. Also, let me know if you
>> have any need for the module.
>>
>> Justin Newman
>> nt_jnewman at yahoo.com
>
>
> Tried to test and got "call could not be completed as dialed".
>
> This sounds very interesting Justin.
>
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Steve Totaro
>
>
> Justin, how about building some additional functionality.
>
> How about a moving stress variable that could be used as a lie detector of sorts or just to measure how certain parts of a script, or certain questions may prove to be more stressful where simply rewording them may have a less stressful response?
>
> I guess to get a baseline, you would have to ask a few inert questions.
>
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Steve Totaro
> +18887771888 (Toll Free)
> +12409381212 (Cell)
> +12024369784 (Skype)
>
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090218/97d91512/attachment.htm 