[asterisk-users] 1.6rc4 chan_iax2 messages
MFH
asterisk-admin at hulber.com
Thu Sep 4 14:03:11 CDT 2008
I was on the call at the time and was not experiencing any apparent
problems.
As I was responding I did some further investigation and saw the
messages even when there wasn't an active call (so I thought). I looked
at the active IAX channels:
[Sep 4 14:27:14] WARNING[2956]: chan_iax2.c:1200 __send_lagrq: I was
supposed to send a LAGRQ with callno 6467, but no such call exists (and
I cannot remove lagid, either).
[Sep 4 14:35:14] WARNING[2958]: chan_iax2.c:1200 __send_lagrq: I was
supposed to send a LAGRQ with callno 5345, but no such call exists (and
I cannot remove lagid, either).
asterisk*CLI> iax2 show channels
Channel Peer Username ID (Lo/Rem) Seq
(Tx/Rx) Lag Jitter JitBuf Format
(None) 67.202.54.166 (None) 02713/00000
00001/00000 00000ms -0001ms 0000ms unknow
1 active IAX channel
and determined that this is a connection to an Amazon EC2 image that I
was using for testing but recently deactivated:
asterisk*CLI> iax2 show peers
Name/Username Host Mask Port Status
asterisk2/aster 67.202.54.166 (S) 255.255.255.255 4569
UNREACHABLE
[asterisk2]
type=friend
username=asterisk2
secret=pass
auth=md5
host=asterisk2.myhost.com
context=frompeer
peercontext=frompeer
qualify=yes
trunk=yes
I'm going to remove this definition and see if the messages go away.
MARK.
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> On Thursday 04 September 2008 12:59:33 MFH wrote:
>
>> As a result of:
>> http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/svn-commits/2008-July/036122.html
>>
>> I am seeing these messages when upgrading for 1.6b9 to 1.6rc4. Is there
>> something I should be doing to address this warning?
>>
>> [Sep 4 13:31:34] WARNING[2954]: chan_iax2.c:1200 __send_lagrq: I was
>> supposed to send a LAGRQ with callno 14670, but no such call exists (and
>> I cannot remove lagid, either).
>> [Sep 4 13:34:34] WARNING[2949]: chan_iax2.c:1200 __send_lagrq: I was
>> supposed to send a LAGRQ with callno 13447, but no such call exists (and
>> I cannot remove lagid, either).
>> [Sep 4 13:39:14] WARNING[2956]: chan_iax2.c:1200 __send_lagrq: I was
>> supposed to send a LAGRQ with callno 14442, but no such call exists (and
>> I cannot remove lagid, either).
>> [Sep 4 13:40:34] WARNING[2949]: chan_iax2.c:1200 __send_lagrq: I was
>> supposed to send a LAGRQ with callno 11096, but no such call exists (and
>> I cannot remove lagid, either).
>> [Sep 4 13:42:14] WARNING[2951]: chan_iax2.c:1200 __send_lagrq: I was
>> supposed to send a LAGRQ with callno 14517, but no such call exists (and
>> I cannot remove lagid, either).
>> [Sep 4 13:42:54] WARNING[2954]: chan_iax2.c:1200 __send_lagrq: I was
>> supposed to send a LAGRQ with callno 2761, but no such call exists (and
>> I cannot remove lagid, either).
>> [Sep 4 13:43:34] WARNING[2949]: chan_iax2.c:1200 __send_lagrq: I was
>> supposed to send a LAGRQ with callno 10117, but no such call exists (and
>> I cannot remove lagid, either).
>> [Sep 4 13:44:54] WARNING[2951]: chan_iax2.c:1200 __send_lagrq: I was
>> supposed to send a LAGRQ with callno 4215, but no such call exists (and
>> I cannot remove lagid, either).
>>
>
> They're actually pretty harmless messages. I may wind up moving them to
> DEBUG only. You'll only get them when a host is unreachable during a call,
> though, so you may want to figure out why that host became unreachable.
>
>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list