[asterisk-users] DAHDI aaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrghhhhhhhhh :((((

[Brendan Martens]

I assume you guys are using 1.6.0, yeah? Looks like there was some  
sort of confusion about dahdi in 1.6.0... I just saw this because of  
Sean Darcy's question about 1.6.0.1 in a different thread. This is  
from the 1.6.0.1 changelog:

2008-10-08  Russell Bryant <russell at digium.com>

	* Asterisk 1.6.0.1 released.

	* configs/chan_dahdi.conf.sample: Remove mention of configuration
	  sections for defining channels in chan_dahdi.conf.  This code
	  is in 1.6.1, and was not merged into 1.6.0.

Maybe that explains why dahdi won't work right? I don't know for sure,  
just noticed this and thought it may be applicable.

Brendan Martens

On Oct 9, 2008, at 11:00 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 08:12:46PM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote:
>> Good point.
>>
>> I have a T100P that will not be seen by DAHDI for anything, but works
>> fabulously with Zaptel.
>
> Which driver does it use?
>
> Is it shown by dahdi_hardware  / zaptel_hardware ? (for  
> zaptel_hardware:
> try in zaptel 1.4.12 and above) .
>
> -- 
>               Tzafrir Cohen
> icq#16849755              jabber:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
> +972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
> http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20081009/ad0fcbf4/attachment.htm