[asterisk-users] Why Nat=yes Nat=no Option?

[Alex Balashov]

Klaus Darilion wrote:

> Of course we know that we should implement RFC conform. But RFC 3261 has 
> ignored the fact that the Internet is full of NATs and standard conform 
> implementations can not work. This in the case of SIP it necessary to 
> break the RFC.

By default?

NAT itself is a hack;  therefore, I would think that NAT traversal 
assistance should be enabled when NAT is used.  Why would we presume NAT 
and implement behaviour that is only desirable under NAT as a default?

-- 
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web    : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel    : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599