[asterisk-users] Realtime status feature - user feedback needed
Ex Vito
ex.vitorino at gmail.com
Wed May 7 19:49:24 CDT 2008
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Benoit Plessis <benoit at plessis.info> wrote:
> Tilghman Lesher a écrit :
> > Your question leads to this question: why don't you create a proxy
> > application that listens on AMI and populates a database outside of Asterisk,
> > then do all your queries to that database? That would provide exactly the
> > same functionality, but it would not require a single change to the Asterisk
> > codebase. You could even contribute that application back as something
> > in the "contrib/scripts" subdirectory.
> >
> >
> I second that,
> If there is already a way to do things, why adding another one,
> especialy if it's for caching reasons.
> While we cannot say that asterisk fall into the KISS rule, it's not
> a reason to let it grow.
>
Agreed. There should be ONE to do it, it should be SIMPLE and
as RELIABLE as possible, without interfereing (bad spelling?) with
asterisk's operations: the proxy into AMI looks like the way to
acheive the required funcionality... After all, that's exactly the
purpose of AMI !
Let's keep the codebase as small as possible, let's make asterisk
as solid and reliable as possible. Let's not reinvent wheels!
--
exvito
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list