[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 reliability problems

Al Baker bwentdg at pipeline.com
Thu Mar 20 00:29:54 CDT 2008


You hit the nail on the head when you said "

, just a few more weeks of testing like we have had for the last
month"

Some of the code you see makes you think the "testing" was slightly more than a clean compile :)


Matt Florell wrote:
> On 3/19/08, Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet at amorsen.dk> wrote:
>   
>> "Matt Florell" <astmattf at gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>  > But seriously, several of my clients use SIP exclusively, passing tens
>>  > of thousand of calls a day on Asterisk 1.2.X with no issues. I have
>>  > noticed that the load is slightly lower for SIP-only in 1.4, but I
>>  > have not noticed any stability issues revolving around SIP on 1.2.X.
>>
>>
>> No hung calls? Our 1.2.x customer PBX's are drowning in "channel.c:
>>  Avoided deadlock for '0x91dbee8', 9 retries!". Of course you can just
>>  ignore the hung calls if you want, but they mess up hint state and
>>  prevent graceful restarts. 1.4.x fixes it.
>>     
>
> I will say that we did notice some SIP issues with older 1.2 releases,
> but on the current 1.2.24+ releases we really haven't had many
> problems, and we do not have hung channels. I should mention that most
> of these installations have all phones on a LAN and almost none of the
> calls are native SIP-bridged since they go through meetme rooms which
> might account for why we do not see problems like this.
>
> As for 1.4.X we are moving closer to putting a live production machine
> on it, just a few more weeks of testing like we have had for the last
> month, and I should be convinced of it's stability.
>
> MATT---
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>   



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list