[asterisk-users] included context not being prioritized properly

[Tilghman Lesher]

On Wednesday 25 June 2008 11:39:33 Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 11:25 -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> > That's only true within the same context.  ONLY if a match is not found
> > in the current context will it go into an included context.
>
> Ahhh.  Well, then that explains it.  Any thoughts on how to achieve my
> goal, without having to encode all of what would be in the override
> context in the outbound-ld context?

Reverse the contexts.  Put all of your exact matches in the main context
and include another context with the pattern match.

-- 
Tilghman