[asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

[Joe Carroll]

Yes, we are using the max tnt to aggregate several PRIs both inbound and outbound from multiple carriers.  This PRI is a normal two way circuit that a carrier would deliver to an end user...



________________________________________
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jay R. Ashworth [jra at baylink.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 9:27 AM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 08:07:18PM -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) wrote:
> On June 4, 2008 06:20:57 pm Joe Carroll wrote:
> > Interestingly enough, on the syslog messages from the TNT we are seeing
> > "Called = 911, Q850 Cause = 28, SIP Response = 484"
>
> That really looks like the switch that the TNT is talking to is rejecting the
> number, not the TNT...

Remember: "9-1-1" is a *dialling pattern*, not a *directory number*;
it's entirely possible that trunks wouldn't accept it directly.

This *is* a *LEC* trunk, right?

Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth                   Baylink                      jra at baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com                     '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA      http://photo.imageinc.us             +1 727 647 1274

             Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
             Those who count the vote decide everything.
               -- (Joseph Stalin)

_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users