[asterisk-users] New faxing protocol. Good/Bad ?

[Steve Totaro]

On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Dovid B <asteriskusers at dovid.net> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tzafrir Cohen" <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com>
> To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 2:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] New faxing protocol. Good/Bad ?
>
>
>> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:54:40AM +0300, Dovid B wrote:
>>> Hi List,
>>> I was thinking the other day that even with T.38 there are still some
>>> issues with faxing. I was thinking of a protocol that instead of just
>>> sending down the fax tones an ATA or "VOIP fax machine" would get the
>>> entire fax convert it into some sort of image and pass it down the line
>>> to the receiving end. I got the idea from RFC2833. Yes I know that fax
>>> machines send bit by bit and get a conformation on it but maybe this
>>> would work a bit better. Send the entire "image" over and then get a
>>> response when it is done. This way if there is issues along the way the
>>> packets can be re-sent with out any issue.
>>>
>>
>> T.37 (fax over email)?
>>
>> --
> Tzafrir,
> Through of it but it requires a mail server. I was thinking of something
> that would work from one fax machine to another. It was just an idea......
>
> Dovid
>

http://mycelery.com/celery_email_machine_email_device_video.php

Maybe throw Callweaver in the mix.....?

Thanks,
Steve Totaro