[asterisk-users] asterisk-1.2.26.tar.gz Thoughts?

[Steve Totaro]

Thomas Kenyon wrote:
> Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>   
>> Well, there is not enough data to suggest that. Before blaming Ira for
>> being such a cheap fellow (after all, he didn't buy one of those IBM big
>> iorns to run Asterisk on) we should also consider that the upgrade to
>> 1.4 probably also involved an upgrade of Zaptel, which *is* kernel
>> space.
>>
>>     
> Does that make someone cheap? My callweaver test system is running on a 
> S/H big heavy IBM server (with redundant PSU, hotswapable, RAID etc.).
>
> Admittedly it was very competatively priced.
>   
Cheap, Frugal, Price Savvy, all may be labels for calling someone 
cheap.  I call it sound fiscal policy providing what you use suits your 
needs and does not cost you more in the long run. 

I have even seen an Emachine running a somewhat busy PBX with over 
year's uptime.  I would call that a gamble but certainly it has paid off 
for them. 

Thanks,
Steve Totaro