[asterisk-users] Enterprise or Fedora?

[cesar at codinet.com.mx]

Ubuntu server for me please

simply, is better...

install.

then activate universe and multiverse repositories

sudo apt-get update

sudo apt-get upgrade

sudo apt-get build-dep asterisk

and then...

tar xvfz
./configure
make
make install
...


is very very easy and clean, and IMHO i guess is better SO Ubuntu than any other RHEL based distro...



IMHO RedHat sucks xP





On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 03:59:47 +0530, "Jaswinder Singh" <vicky.r at gmail.com> wrote:
> I prefer CentOS barebone install and yumming the way up for dependencies
> but
> manually compile asterisk/zaptel . Ubuntu servers are pretty good too
> since
> its repositories are quite bigger compared to CentOS .
> 
> On Feb 2, 2008 11:45 PM, shadowym <shadowym at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Actively maintained or actively being broken and fixed with constant
>> updates?  Not something suitable for Production IMHO.  Makes more sense
>> for
>> development and experimentation IMHO.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Benny Amorsen [mailto:benny+usenet at amorsen.dk]
>> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 1:54 PM
>> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
>> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Enterprise or Fedora?
>>
>> "shadowym" <shadowym at hotmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > I cannot think of a single reason to use Fedora for a production
>> anything
>> > when there are alternatives like CentOS.  Fedora is bleeding edge
> stuff
>> and
>> > constantly changing.
>>
>> The advantage of Fedora is that it is very actively maintained -- and
>> asterisk is only a yum install asterisk away!
>>
>>
>> /Benny
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>
>> asterisk-users mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
> 
>