[asterisk-users] wcfxo and X100P card won't play nice.

[Brent Davidson]

Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 09:44:25AM -0500, Brent Davidson wrote:
>   
>> Alex Balashov wrote:
>>     
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> This may have already been asked many times, but I cannot seem to find a 
>>> satisfactory and consistent answer anywhere.
>>>
>>> I have an X100P card (from x100p.com) installed in a Dell PowerEdge 2850 
>>> or 2650 (cannot recall):
>>>
>>> 00:00.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CMIC-WS Host Bridge (GC-LE chipset) (rev 13)
>>> 00:00.1 Host bridge: Broadcom CMIC-WS Host Bridge (GC-LE chipset)
>>> 00:00.2 Host bridge: Broadcom CMIC-LE
>>> 00:04.0 Class ff00: Dell Embedded Remote Access or ERA/O
>>> 00:04.1 Class ff00: Dell Remote Access Card III
>>> 00:04.2 Class ff00: Dell Embedded Remote Access: BMC/SMIC device
>>> 00:0e.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27)
>>> 00:0f.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CSB5 South Bridge (rev 93)
>>> 00:0f.1 IDE interface: Broadcom CSB5 IDE Controller (rev 93)
>>> 00:0f.2 USB Controller: Broadcom OSB4/CSB5 OHCI USB Controller (rev 05)
>>> 00:0f.3 ISA bridge: Broadcom CSB5 LPC bridge
>>> 00:10.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-X2 PCI-X I/O Bridge (rev 03)
>>> 00:10.2 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-X2 PCI-X I/O Bridge (rev 03)
>>> 00:11.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-X2 PCI-X I/O Bridge (rev 03)
>>> 00:11.2 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-X2 PCI-X I/O Bridge (rev 03)
>>> 01:06.0 Communication controller: Motorola Wildcard X100P
>>> 03:06.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5701 
>>> Gigabit Ethernet (rev 15)
>>> 03:08.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5701 
>>> Gigabit Ethernet (rev 15)
>>> 04:08.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 80303 I/O Processor PCI-to-PCI 
>>> Bridge (rev 01)
>>> 04:08.1 RAID bus controller: Dell PowerEdge Expandable RAID Controller 
>>> 3/Di (rev 01)
>>>
>>> But, wcfxo won't recognise it:
>>>
>>> NOTICE-wcfxo: WCFXO/0: Unknown DAA chip revision: REVB=0
>>> Failed to initailize DAA, giving up...
>>> wcfxo: probe of 0000:01:06.0 failed with error -5
>>>
>>> This is running on a custom-compiled kernel 2.6.24.3 with Asterisk 
>>> 1.4.18 and Zaptel 1.4.10.
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>>> -- Alex
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> Is that a genuine X100P or a clone?  Looks like a modem that has been 
>> made to look like an X100P.
>>     
>
> What's the difference?

There are some driver peculiarities with some of the Modem-based X100P's 
that cause them to not be detected correctly by wcfxo.

-Brent
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080416/854055d5/attachment.htm