[asterisk-users] difference between FXO interfaces !
Edgar Guadamuz
eguadamuz at gmail.com
Sun Oct 14 22:34:11 CDT 2007
The model AP200 that you are giving as example is 2 port only... and
i'm not sure about the price...
I know that codec conversion is one of the most cpu-intensive task
that asterisk has to do, so, you can chose a Digium/Sangoma card with
a "powerful" server doing the work or you can also use a VoIP gateway
with a cheaper and less powerful asterisk box. It depens so much in
your resources..
On 10/14/07, Mandeep Singh Bhabha <mandeep.bhabha at ponimanie.spb.ru> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> Which one is a better choice
> 1. Gateway device with FXO <-> SIP ( example Addpac
> http://www.addpac.com/addpac_eng2/addpac_product_view_detail.php?class_id=19&item_id=59
> )
> 2. Digium (Wildcard TDM400P)
> 3. Sangoma (A200 Analog FXO/FXS)
>
> All i need is to put asterisk in place with 4-8 incomming lines (ordinary POTS ).
> With IVR, Voice mail and International Call via SIP. Office is having 12
> phone lines.
> Thanks in Advance to all who shared his/her wisdom.
>
> --
> With Regards,
> Mandeep Singh Bhabha
> email: mandeep at ponimanie.spb.ru
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list