[asterisk-users] Opinions on Release Numbering

[Emiliano Vazquez]

rc1, rc2 is the best choice for me.


Best Regards. Emiliano Vazquez.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Russell Bryant" <russell at digium.com>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" 
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 2:54 PM
Subject: [asterisk-users] Opinions on Release Numbering


>I have been having discussions with various members of the development 
>community
> in regards to changes to the way we manage open source Asterisk releases. 
> The
> changes that we eventually decide on will determine how we manage the 1.6
> version of Asterisk.  I will be posting much more detailed information 
> about 1.6
> in the near future.
>
> What I'm looking for right now is some opinions on version numbering. 
> Part of
> the working plan for Asterisk 1.6 involves making release candidates for 
> every
> 1.6.X release, so that various community members can help with doing 
> regression
> testing on the changes before making the release.
>
> I proposed calling the release candidates 1.6.3-rc1, 1.6.3-rc2, etc.
>
> Another proposal has been using 1.5 to indicate that it is a release 
> candidate.
> For example, 1.5.3, 1.5.3.1, 1.5.3.2, etc., would be the release 
> candidates for
> the upcoming 1.6.3 release.
>
> What is your opinion?  I certainly want the release naming to be as 
> obvious as
> possible.
>
> -- 
> Russell Bryant
> Senior Software Engineer
> Open Source Team Lead
> Digium, Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users