[asterisk-users] DS3 Interface
Steve Totaro
stotaro at totarotechnologies.com
Tue Oct 9 10:30:22 CDT 2007
I did not look at the specs of the card but if it has inboard DSPs, it
may work just fine in a high end box.
Thanks,
Steve
Matt wrote:
> It's not the Ethernet interface that would be the issue. The zaptel
> framework wouldn't be able to handle it with the way it uses interrupts.
>
> On 10/9/07, * Patrick* <asterisk-list at puzzled.xs4all.nl
> <mailto:asterisk-list at puzzled.xs4all.nl>> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 10:14 -0400, Matt wrote:
> > Before you put any work into this... ask yourself... what exactly are
> > you hoping to accomplish?
>
> I can imagine it be used as a TDM-SIP gateway but if I needed such a
> box
> I'd rather go for a Lucent MaxTNT, Lucent APX8000 or a Cisco 5xxx or
> look at FreeSWITCH which by design seems more suitable for these kind of
> high performance applications.
>
> > There is no way one system can handle a DS3s worth of traffic...
> > therefore, what good would this do?
>
> Why wouldn't today's powerful quadcore servers with Gigabit Ethernet
> interfaces not be able to handle less than 100Mbit/s synchronous
> traffic? Please enlighten me as I am no expert here.
>
> Regards,
> Patrick
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list