[asterisk-users] DS3 Interface

Steve Totaro stotaro at totarotechnologies.com
Tue Oct 9 10:30:22 CDT 2007


I did not look at the specs of the card but if it has inboard DSPs, it 
may work just fine in a high end box.

Thanks,
Steve

Matt wrote:
> It's not the Ethernet interface that would be the issue.  The zaptel 
> framework wouldn't be able to handle it with the way it uses interrupts.
> 
> On 10/9/07, * Patrick* <asterisk-list at puzzled.xs4all.nl 
> <mailto:asterisk-list at puzzled.xs4all.nl>> wrote:
> 
>     On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 10:14 -0400, Matt wrote:
>      > Before you put any work into this... ask yourself... what exactly are
>      > you hoping to accomplish?
> 
>     I can imagine it be used as a TDM-SIP gateway but if I needed such a
>     box
>     I'd rather go for a Lucent MaxTNT, Lucent APX8000 or a Cisco 5xxx or
>     look at FreeSWITCH which by design seems more suitable for these kind of
>     high performance applications.
> 
>      > There is no way one system can handle a DS3s worth of traffic...
>      > therefore, what good would this do?
> 
>     Why wouldn't today's powerful quadcore servers with Gigabit Ethernet
>     interfaces not be able to handle less than 100Mbit/s synchronous
>     traffic? Please enlighten me as I am no expert here.
> 
>     Regards,
>     Patrick
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
> 
>     asterisk-users mailing list
>     To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>        http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list