[asterisk-users] zaptel upgrade trouble (1.2.10 -> 1.2.20.1)

Artifex Maximus artifexor at gmail.com
Tue Oct 2 11:20:54 CDT 2007


On 10/2/07, Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 12:47:55PM +0200, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> > On 10/2/07, Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 10:06:06AM +0200, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> > > > Hello!
> > > >
> > > > I have been trying upgrade zaptel from 1.2.10 to 1.2.20.1. I am using
> > > > asterisk 1.2.10 with one TDM2400P (all 6 module in use) and one
> > > > TE405P. When I upgrade to 1.2.20.1 the order of cards mess up and
> > > > therefore zaptel.conf is unusable and gives error. Why is it happen
> > > > and what do I need to change in zaptel.conf?
> > > >
> > > > now zaptel.conf is:
> > > > loadzone=hu
> > > > defaultzone=hu
> > > > # GSM
> > > > fxsks=1-4
> > > > # FAX
> > > > fxoks=5-8
> > > > # EXT
> > > > fxoks=9-24
> > > > # PRI
> > > > span=2,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
> > > > bchan=25-39
> > > > dchan=40
> > > > bchan=41-55
> > > >
> > > > zttool shows that my TDM is the first device and T4XXP is from second
> > > > to fifth. Nice. After zaptel upgrade TDM is on the fifth position. And
> > > > channels in zaptel.conf were messed up of course because 1-24 is not
> > > > for TDM.
> > >
> > > Was there also a change in the kernel ?
> > >
> > > In the value of MODULES in /etc/{sysconfig,default}/zaptel ?
> > Thanks for your answer. Same kernel (2.6.11) and no change in zaptel:
> >
> > MODULES="$MODULES wct4xxp"      # TE405P - Quad Span T1/E1 Card (5v version)
> > MODULES="$MODULES wctdm24xxp"   # TDM2400P - Modular FXS/FXO interface
> > (1-24 ports)
> >
> > Might MODULES order count? If so why that wasn't count with zaptel 1.2.10?
>
> It counts if the modules weren't loaded earlier on boot time, and if you
> use the proper init.d script.
I see. I've been using the init.d script from release which I think
proper. Is it means there is logical difference between 1.2.10 and
1.2.20.1 on init.d script level? Because 1.2.10 is working flawless
with this MODULES setup.

bye,
a



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list