[asterisk-users] res_mysql versus res_odbc

Tilghman Lesher tilghman at mail.jeffandtilghman.com
Fri Nov 2 10:10:50 CDT 2007

On Friday 02 November 2007 08:46:03 Tony Plack wrote:
> <html><head><meta name="Generator" content="PSI HTML/CSS Generator"/>
> <style type="text/css"><!--
> body{font-family:'Tahoma';font-size:10pt;font-color:'#000000';}
> LI{display:list-item;margin:0.00in;}
> p{display:block;margin:0.00in;}
> body{}
> --></style>
> </head><BODY BGCOLOR="#CED1E1" ><div><SPAN
> style="font-family:'Tahoma';font-size:10pt;">I am currently using MySQL for
> * real time and using the res_odbc to connect just fine.</SPAN></div>
> <div>&nbsp;</div>
> <div><SPAN style="font-family:'Tahoma';font-size:10pt;">Is there any
> performance or other gains to be had by using the res_mysql from the addon
> package instead?</SPAN></div> </body></html>

No, it's not even the same functionality.  res_mysql.conf is the configuration
file for res_config_mysql.so, which is a realtime package.  res_odbc.so is a
pooling system for ODBC connections.  The ODBC analogue to res_config_mysql.so
is res_config_odbc.so.


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list