[asterisk-users] Where an extension really is (DUNDi woes)

[Remco Post]

Kyle Sexton wrote:
> On 6/15/07, *Anthony Francis* <anthonyf at rockynet.com
> <mailto:anthonyf at rockynet.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Kyle Sexton wrote:
>     > I have two servers setup to do DUNDi lookups against each other.  The
>     > scenario is that on server A, I have a wildcard match for extensions
>     > 64XX that rings to a local extension on the server.  On server B I
>     > have a 6442 real extension that I would like to have ring if called.
>     > It seems that DUNDi is matching on the 64XX and not searching out to
>     > see if there is a *more* exact match than the pattern match.  Is
>     there
>     > any way to get around this?
> 
>     I don't think I am incorrect in saying that dundi doesn't look for
>     externally that which it knows about locally. I think thats pretty
>     standard of routing protocols.
> 
> 
> I was afraid of that.  It just means I have to explicitly list every
> number in the DID range (so hundreds of extensions).  I was hoping DUNDi
> would make the dialplan simpler. :(
> 

it will, look into the regexten for your sip accounts. Now have dundi
lookup a number in that extension... Now, you might need to abstract
extension numbers from sip accounts, but that only has advantages anyway...

> -- 
> Kyle Sexton
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


-- 

Remco Post

"I didn't write all this code, and I can't even pretend that all of it
makes sense." -- Glen Hattrup