[asterisk-users] Re: [asterisk-dev] CDR changes in Trunk --
Transfers, CDRs, Life, and Everything
David Boyd
dboyd at ignitetrx.com
Tue Jun 12 15:34:42 CDT 2007
Murf,
you crack me up, but I totally agree with the vote or don't complain
model.
Thanks,
Dave
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 13:05 -0600, Steve Murphy wrote:
> I have created an asterisk.org blog entry:
>
> http://www.asterisk.org/node/48358
>
> to describe what I will shortly be committing to trunk to correct the
> weaknesses of CDRs, that asterisk users and developers have been
> complaining about for quite some time.
>
> Highlights: Restructuring the code and philosophy of CDRs.
> Plans to eliminate the ForkCDR() application
> Plans to create the CDRstart(),
> CDRanswer(handle),
> and CDRclose(handle) functions to provide
> dialplan ability to create CDR records.
>
> (I am considering restructuring the CDR function, also,
> to allow mods to be made to not only Channel-attached
> CDR's,
> but also the fields in CDRs created by CDRstart(), BTW).
>
> I seek feedback from folks who have battled with CDRs to develop billing
> applications, and those who plan doing so in the future. Participate or
> be happy with the senseless mess that will surely result from your
> non-participation!
>
> murf
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list