[asterisk-users] Re: [asterisk-dev] CDR changes in Trunk -- Transfers, CDRs, Life, and Everything

David Boyd dboyd at ignitetrx.com
Tue Jun 12 15:34:42 CDT 2007


Murf,

you crack me up, but I totally agree with the vote or don't complain
model.


Thanks,
Dave

On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 13:05 -0600, Steve Murphy wrote:
> I have created an asterisk.org blog entry:
> 
> http://www.asterisk.org/node/48358
> 
> to describe what I will shortly be committing to trunk to correct the
> weaknesses of CDRs, that asterisk users and developers have been
> complaining about for quite some time.
> 
> Highlights: Restructuring the code and philosophy of CDRs.
>             Plans to eliminate the ForkCDR() application
>             Plans to create the CDRstart(),
>                                 CDRanswer(handle),
>                             and CDRclose(handle) functions to provide
>                dialplan ability to create CDR records.
> 
>             (I am considering restructuring the CDR function, also,
>              to allow mods to be made to not only Channel-attached
> CDR's, 
>              but also the fields in CDRs created by CDRstart(), BTW).
> 
> I seek feedback from folks who have battled with CDRs to develop billing
> applications, and those who plan doing so in the future. Participate or
> be happy with the senseless mess that will surely result from your
> non-participation!
> 
> murf
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list