[asterisk-users] H.264 *Not Patented*

Steve Kennedy steve-asterisk at gbnet.net
Sat Jan 27 08:43:25 MST 2007


On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:20:40AM -0500, Matthew Rubenstein wrote:

> 	How does H.264 compare with GSM and G.729 in CPU demand (MIPS:Kbps) and
> audio quality at low bitrates? GSM is $free, but G.729 is higher quality
> (tho patented with at least $10 per running codec instance royalties).
> Will H.264 become the favorite high-quality Asterisk codec, or will it
> perhaps force G.729 to become free, or negligibly cheaper?

G.729 is $10 from Digium. If you want to go license several thousand
codecs (or probably more like 10's of thousands) I think the Sipro
license is more like a couple of bucks. Unfortunately you have to
license a large number in one go, so the initial set-up is very high.

Digium have done a deal (I presume) whereby they've taken the intial hit
and are just sub-licensing at a cost which make it whorth while for them.

Steve

-- 
NetTek Ltd  UK mob +44-(0)7775 755503
UK +44-(0)20 79932612 / US +1-(310)8577715 / Fax +44-(0)20 7483 2455
Skype/GoogleTalk/AIM/Gizmo/Mac stevekennedyuk / MSN steve at gbnet.net
Euro Tech News Blog http://eurotechnews.blogspot.com


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list