[asterisk-users] Practical limit on dial prefixes for a route

[Eric Germann]

I'm aware of Cingular being GSM.  We're standardizing on Sprint since
Cingular is less than optimal around here.

Even with LNP, knowing the NPA-NXX would nail probably 90%+ of our people.
The ones that are on LNP could be added as 10 digit LCR.

>From a technical standpoint, can * handle over 1000+ prefixes on a route?

EKG


-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of John Novack
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 9:42 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Practical limit on dial prefixes for a route



Eric Germann wrote:
> Colleagues,
>
> We're in the process of standardizing on Sprint PCS and Cingular phones on
a national basis (~ 50 properties, 1000's of lines).  I manage an Asterisk
install at one location.
>
> I've been looking at the Multitech CellFinder CDMA for Sprint as a dial
backup solution. Basically, it's a CDMA to POTS gateway, tied to a PCS
account.  We would see it as a trunk line and I would like to do LCR and
route out the CellFinder line(s)^ all PCS calls, since we have free PCS to
PCS.
>   
Two comments:
Cingular is GSM,
Sprint is CDMA

With LNP , NPA-NXX isn't enough information to determine free on network
calling Since wireline to wireless LNP, the NPA assignments are no longer
locked to a specific carrier.


John Novack

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users