[asterisk-users] Some queries on g729 license.

[Al Bochter]

What about the free open source G729

Best regards,

Al Bochter
Bochter Services
http://www.BochterServices.com/?t=Email



Matthew Rubenstein wrote:

>	I connect to a PSTN carrier over SIP which requires me to connect with
>a g729 codec. I'm using them for just robocalling: Asterisk server
>originates calls which play a prerecorded file. Can I pre-encode those
>stored files in g729 so they don't need to be encoded for each call? If
>so, do I need a g729 license for each call, or just a license for the
>preencoder? If the robocalls accept incoming DTMF, do I need g729
>licenses for those calls?
>
>
>On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 04:08 -0700,
>asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com wrote:
>  
>
>>Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:47:39 +0800
>>From: Leo Ann Boon <leo at datvoiz.com>
>>Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Some queries on g729 license.
>>To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>>        <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
>>Message-ID: <45A1DAFB.9070704 at datvoiz.com>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>
>>Xue Liangliang wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Hi, all
>>>
>>>I am a pabx vendor from Singapore. Recently we are going to
>>>      
>>>
>>implement 
>>    
>>
>>>a failover solution for our customers using heartbeat, the asterisk 
>>>server can failover perfectly, however the g729 codec canot work, 
>>>because it is binded the mac address, we have bought two set of 
>>>licenses, can you provide us some workaround for this scenario?
>>>      
>>>
>>It shouldn't be a problem if you're only doing IP takeover and have 
>>bound the licenses to each server separately.  If you're sharing the 
>>storage, then that could pose a problem.
>>
>>Leo
>>DatVoiz Singapore Pte Ltd 
>>    
>>