[asterisk-users] Re: FW: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64

[Tzafrir Cohen]

On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 12:52:22AM +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> On 21 Feb 2007, at 23:06, Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 06:01:35AM -0500, Carlos Alperin wrote:
> >>I tried to test Asterisk 1.4 on FC6 x86_64. I have it working on  
> >>FC5 x86_64
> >>very good, but since FC keeps updating, I tried to follow newer  
> >>kernel
> >>versions.
> >
> >If you want to save these hassles, why not use the packages bits that
> >are available for FC5/FC6/RHEL4/RHEL3 i386/x86_64/ppc? There are even
> >packages for the upcoming F7 and RHEL5 available:
> 
> Hi Axel,
> 
> I tried to use the 1.2.x RPMs and they would not work for me  
> attempting to use them with an Eicon Diva Server card and Melware's  
> chan_capi. Only by looking at the SRPM did I notice that they are  
> patched with BRIStuff patches, which I have assume causes  
> incompatibilities. 

Why is the a problem? The bristuff zaptel patch is a really small and
non-intrussive one. The bristuff Asterisk patch, though, includes a 
complete reimplementation of chan_capi (the Junghanns' original
chan_capi), which I heard noone really uses.

> Compiling Asterisk and Zaptel from sources again  
> solved all my problems. It may be helpful to spell out more clearly  
> how severaly patched the Asterisk in those RPMs is.

I wonder if it is just Asterisk or Asterisk and Zaptel.

-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen       
icq#16849755                    jabber:tzafrir at jabber.org
+972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com       
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir