[asterisk-users] Summary of "Trixbox vs. custom install"

John McCollough john at lannetwork.com
Fri Feb 16 12:12:35 MST 2007


 
Actually, there's a very easy way to install Trixbox with RAID right
from the CD.  All you have to do is edit one file on the root of the
ISO, burn the image and boot from it.  I have used it myself with great
success, though I'm not sure if it has been tested on 2.0.

The instructions are at
http://dumbme.voipeye.com.au/trixbox/trixbox_without_tears.htm#_Toc15759
1311

John McCollough
LAN Network Connections, Inc
(603)622-8557
 

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tom Rymes
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 11:57 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Summary of "Trixbox vs. custom install"

On Feb 15, 2007, at 7:01 PM, Stefano Corsi wrote:

> Hello everybody. First of all thanks to all the people giving their 
> opinion on the subject I proposed: "Trixbox vs. custom install".
> You've all been very helpful.

[snip]

> I also include a consideration from mine: I would happily use Trixbox,

> because I did FreePBX setup once and it was a real pain, but I'm very 
> frightened by a few issues:
>
> 1) Trixbox "Macho" installation that installs everything without 
> asking. I, for example, would like to use software RAID (maybe it's 
> wrong with Asterisk, but I want to do it!). I wouldn't like doing it 
> manually after Trixbox installation. I would like to have an installer

> doing it for me. Centos (ex redhat) installer does it, so why Trixbox 
> choose to install everything without prompting?

Stefano,

Great summary. As an aside here, it is possible to install Trixbox on
top of an existing CentOS installation by using the tarball, not the
ISO. This works very well, with one issue I ran into. A fresh install of
CentOS updated via yum will not have the correct version of the kernel
to match the zaptel-modules RPM shipped with Trixbox (because it is no
longer in the repositories). You can fix this problem two ways:

1.) Manually install the kernel from the Trixbox CD, which will fix the
problem, if you prefer to work just the way Trixbox normally does. You
should configure yum to not upgrade the kernel in this case, because
that would break zaptel.
2.) You can download and manually recompile zaptel on your own.  
Either you will have to recompile zaptel every time that the kernel is
upgraded by yum, or you should configure yum to not upgrade the kernel.
(This is true of any zaptel install, not just Trixbox.)

See the bug i posted: http://www.trixbox.org/modules/xproject/
index.php?op=viewTicketMain&id=27

Another resolution would be to provide an SRPM for the zaptel-modules
package, which you (or the tarball install script) could rpmbuild --
rebuild against your current kernel.

Either way, this isn't a big problem so long as you know it's there.  
Worst case scenario, you just download and compile zaptel, which you
would have had to do anyway for a non-trixbox install.

Tom
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list