[asterisk-users] Unicall and Private CID

[Moises Silva]

I would not call that properly a fix. We need to know why is failing
in newer spandsp versions in the first place. Can you make a diff and
post it?

On 8/3/07, Carlos Chavez <cursor at telecomabmex.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 00:23 -0300, Luis Antonio Prata Barbosa wrote:
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
> > I suggest you download spandsp-0.0.3pre22.
> > (http://www.neuwald.biz/files/spandsp-0.0.3pre22.gz)
> >
> > I don´t know why , spandsp after that uses digits 1,2..8,9,A,B,C,D,E,F
> > instead of 1,2,..,9,0,A,B,C,D,E. So, do you get "F" digits that are
> > incompatible with mfcr2 .
> >
> Thank you.  I got an older set of files I had on another server (pre6)
> and now everything is working.  The customer now gets CID and calls from
> Nextel.
>
> This is probably the way to fix Unicall on 1.4 since it uses a newer
> version of spandsp and has the exact same problem.
>
> >
> --
> Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de México S.A. de C.V.
> Carlos Chávez Prats
> Director de Tecnología
> +52-55-91169161 ext 2001
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>


-- 
"Su nombre es GNU/Linux, no solamente Linux, mas info en http://www.gnu.org"