[asterisk-users] Slightly OT: SNOM & PoE
Mark J Elkins
mje at posix.co.za
Fri Aug 3 03:26:05 CDT 2007
Anthony Cennami wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I apologize for the slightly off-topic question, but I'm sure that the
> people best acquainted with the issue would be hanging around here.
>
> Question is, what are people using today to deploy PoE, and more
> importantly, PoE to SNOM phones?
We are running SNOM360's off a Planet POE Switch (FGSW-2620PVS)
This gives us 24 x 10/100 with PoE on all (but the GigE) ports (Power
over the data lines - not on unused copper pairs) and 2 GigE ports
(Copper + SPF). We then plug the Asterisk machine into one of the GigE's
and the other GigE into the rest of the network.
This works well with a centralised wiring closet - now all the phones
are on their own switch - making interference more un-lightly. The
Switch allows you to look at the power consumption - which technically
means you can judge when there could be a "power problem". Oh - pretty
well priced too.. we paid about US $680 for the switch - which makes it
'low end' cost wise. Currently has no SNMP :-( - but has a Linux
friendly web front-end including setup of QoS, Access control and PoE
power consumption.
POE Ports Status
Port Enable Power[mW] Current [mA]
Port Enable Power[mW] Current [mA]
1 Enable 9 46
2 Disable 0 0
3 Disable 0 0
4 Disable 0 0
5 Disable 0 0
6 Disable 0 0
7 Disable 0 0
8 Disable 0 0
9 Disable 0 0
10 Disable 0 0
11 Disable 0 0
12 Disable 0 0
13 Enable 426 8
14 Disable 0 0
15 Enable 2333 46
16 Disable 0 0
17 Disable 0 0
18 Disable 0 0
19 Enable 2206 45
20 Enable 499 48
21 Disable 0 0
22 Disable 0 0
23 Disable 0 0
24 Disable 0 0
OK - so not many ports are active - but its interesting to see that each
port seems to be consuming different levels of power...
--
. . ___. .__ Posix Systems - Sth Africa
/| /| / /__ mje at posix.co.za - Mark J Elkins, SCO ACE, Cisco CCIE
/ |/ |ARK \_/ /__ LKINS Tel: +27 12 807 0590 Cell: +27 82 601 0496
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list