[asterisk-users] Re: Tunnel Q.SIG through an IP network

[Olivier]

I thought the purpose of "transparent tunneling" was indeed to pass vendor
specific Q.SIG signal through.
Is it correct ?

2007/4/24, laurent schweizer <laurent.schweizer at gmail.com>:
>
> Hi,
>
> the problem with QSIG is that each vendors have addons ....
>
> if you use patton smart node for Qsig tunneling betwenn 2 PBX from the
> same vendors, then pehraps you will lost some services, because the smart
> node is not implemeting all addons.
>
>  Laurent
>
> 2007/4/24, Olivier <oza-4h07 at myamail.com>:
> >
> > Replying to myself, this feature is called "Transparent Q.SIGTunneling".
> > Several gateway vendors (Patton, Audiocodes, Mediatrix) support it and
> > Asterisk doesn't ...
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com<http://easynews.com/>--
> >
> > asterisk-users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070424/cf0a6058/attachment.htm