[asterisk-users] extensions.conf #include behaviour
lists at minotaur.cc
Thu Apr 19 03:56:18 MST 2007
A quick question regarding extensions.conf #include behaviour if I may. I'm sure someone will know the answer off the top of their head...
How does asterisk handle "overloading" of contexts. For example, say an extension exists in extensions.conf as follows:
Then one includes a, b and c.conf, each of which also contains:
<more stuff - but none identical to the other incoming sections>
Would the last #include overwrite the whole [incoming] context, or would it simply append the new directives to it?
Is it possible to change the behaviour at all?
Thanks in advance.
C.M. Bagnall, Director, Minotaur I.T. Limited
For full contact details visit http://www.minotaur.it/chris.html
This email is made from 100% recycled electrons
More information about the asterisk-users