[asterisk-users] MOH in 1.4 - Still Broken?

[Douglas Garstang]

Ahh, I assume your talking about mohinterpret and mohsuggest I assume.
Thanks.

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Jason Parker [mailto:jparker at digium.com] 
	Sent: Mon 9/25/2006 6:36 PM 
	To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
	Cc: 
	Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] MOH in 1.4 - Still Broken?
	
	

	----- Douglas Garstang <dgarstang at oneeighty.com> wrote:
	> Oops I got that a bit mixed up. I meant to say that when party A put
	> party B on hold, the moh class used should be party A's moh.
	> Essentially the moh class used should be what's defined for the person
	> putting the OTHER party on hold.
	>
	> Doug.
	>
	
	Take a look at the new sample configs for (random example) SIP, and look at the new moh options.
	
	--
	Jason Parker
	Digium
	
	_______________________________________________
	--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
	
	asterisk-users mailing list
	To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
	   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users