[asterisk-users] MOH in 1.4 - Still Broken?

[Jason Parker]

----- Douglas Garstang <dgarstang at oneeighty.com> wrote:
> Oops I got that a bit mixed up. I meant to say that when party A put
> party B on hold, the moh class used should be party A's moh.
> Essentially the moh class used should be what's defined for the person
> putting the OTHER party on hold.
> 
> Doug.
> 

Take a look at the new sample configs for (random example) SIP, and look at the new moh options.

-- 
Jason Parker
Digium