[asterisk-users] Aastra 9133i and Atcom AT-320 - Comments please

[Jerry Jones]

We tested a couple 9133i, dont remember the specifics right now but  
we stopped as there was some inconsistency in provisioning. I was  
very optimistic as I like the look and feel. We did deploy a couple  
480iCT which worked very well - when they worked. But they keep  
locking up and freezzing under heavy use, plus they have speakerphone  
and rfi issues.

You may wish to checkout the Polycom IP430, about the same price and  
have been very solid after installing 50 or so to date.


On Sep 19, 2006, at 8:15 AM, Dave Cotton wrote:

> On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 13:13 +0100, James Dyer wrote:
>> I'm planning to deploy an Asterisk system in our office soon, and am
>> thinking of using a mixture of Aastra 9133i and Atcom AT-320 phones.
>>
>> Has anyone got any comments (good or bad) about these phone models?
>
> I now only use Aastra phones, the 9133i is solid and professional
> looking and works very well with *. My experience with support is A1.
>
> Message waiting is well signalled as is no service.
>
> The switch and POE save a lot of cabling.
>
>
> -- 
> Dave Cotton <dcotton at linuxautrement.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users