[asterisk-users] When does Scalability requests Asterisk to Use SER ?

[Rushowr]

Marco Mouta wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm planing to develop a solution based on Asterisk for about 300 users.
> My question now is, do I really need to use openSER as the sip proxy and
> Asterisk for the PBX functions?
> 
> Can i trust in a solution only with Asterisk to make all this install?
> 
> Please help me with your experience on this kind of asterisk solutions.
> 
> I've googled and read about asterisk at large scale solutions, but still
> in doubt.
> http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+at+large
> 
> 
> -- 
> Com os melhores cumprimentos,
> 
> Marco Mouta
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

In my experience, yes you can use *just* asterisk for the implementation
of a large scale setup, you just better be sure you've planned it out
well. I've set up a few large scale Asterisk implementations, covering
more than 1K users on a single box. And that was in 2005 using trunk.
There were problems, but all in all it was (and is, for the former
client) not a bad implementation. If you're just looking at a large PBX
install, you're definitely fine with a well planned system.

Just my $0.02, not to be taken as a guarantee ;-)


-- 
S McGowan
VoIP Consultant
rushowr at phreaker.net

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) - WinPT 0.12.3

mQGiBETxLJERBACrFvzk3Hd8AO9aGCSSgoabp8GGS7jYhR1UP9zqYeJIHeH+/r/D
sCL0mPUGX1+FnVlh5UAO0Q3hueCdtgbAhdqMJMDhjQ2Tm10kBWu2DjWrLVnGx0QD
Id1XAiQ1WIJkE2VqphKD0WVMsyxj08w+o+DwjD+mu3GCgitRTVOB9OnzpwCg3Ynx
BHlbNUzLTp+3oUuudndpaiEEAIlBCJoIg+zCTg4/kFjsWfSYo3kTwNoQPqqMINMe
GM15CkRvXgUdMgJMPeEqXNmfnUUHNf/6KD2WpP5kJcBZdNWHicvS+A+P1Sjuybio
5XlJgMDW5tzCX0V45n+RgZQjHMg1wpcv0eVOMhmaSL4eC7MyUnZBHzuBYmgNMpiM
EF2wA/4y+hhoZ2SYUzTWk4QUPL8yaHTNS/4/aH8AB5cyRNljqT5//AXzYF3AxMZX
bslWy4MtzX9CI9Zg8hxIzcaYp/oeFSVrv6Or/8ZRQk2T+eB7ymPY6T+SOcKfTgR2
f9kzlxtPjRK/nXDovjaaOGl0U0NaPemB0w8fEuNkF4LxKdAea7QgUyBNY0dvd2Fu
IDxydXNob3dyQHBocmVha2VyLm5ldD6IYAQTEQIAIAUCRPEskQIbAwYLCQgHAwIE
FQIIAwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEJX0LL+xQYafrbQAoKFzcLsRIkXWL1wzldi2iG4l
FHD/AKCguGXH7GtZKpQfFct6vQUOnJuUB7kCDQRE8SygEAgAlOYMwiFKPALEpi/X
Cb3kTzpDqi9yvlijssnyxY2IxTYJHheE2dkITtdmgFlfud0lCLiSVhf8i9Y2YCar
I+Djz7/LTlX4lhcDBeAaSHfDUtr5jTn3caK5A3inCAxoI7Um9Sy3fSyW9DMww2Mj
t+ysQ2XuXpRZ984/3X79kNttae7L3FqASHjfflUFhBukxpSAn5evmkAnmZDhjy5a
Z9Ut+DGDQOG2qvDTZM/RFDyodLIRoW9AK2O3A7CtVjZVOTSjDdhdOsHzsuBioh51
ngfUo4B3hDy+tv5qtzD5UjVj8g+oFqDpjo7mj7EwhD/AqHxg6yKqOtVLTmeEdZzW
RMMGkwADBQgAjutKcj73K0GqhlKP3D3plXXBLOeAnoUBMoxbd7u7HigTXkTeq7gX
c+zC6pu3atL1piRBOTYPiflf36hkph+EC9Zu7fBmaIdKRqltV9m+XB5l6Kw/C4go
hTeLFI5A61GmiyQ5NPRpaeERGba+EoWswYIUxkCmr7I02DL8R72oLu6bb+bevCz5
d1AKrY2Vg3M8IXhGHPrYoFup6EYC6Thp2wRG4vBtpQStFbdYjXNBYmwWNERPzOzb
k3pU8y96X7mqLHbv6gi5wapJyPidasc3VtU7RrwSEsYDoc2nf+6KzZMTT3rnB9RL
gns2mcXM/4utmBWzSL7tnil5mlI9dynHQYhJBBgRAgAJBQJE8SygAhsMAAoJEJX0
LL+xQYafclwAnAmrmJpITi7ngFNR/obx/l6tNPRqAJ477VYqaBg58lc+TlGK1DoA
HeMrow==
=GJrg
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060919/59b146cd/signature.pgp