[asterisk-users] Intel Based G.729 and SVN-trunk-r42453

[Jason Lee]

Hi,

Has anyone else experianced any problems with the Intel Based G729 codec?
I've tried numerous times but the codec just doesn't seem to work with my
test system. If anyone has a solution to this problem please do let me know.

I've posted a core dump from an asterisk crash when using this codec
http://pastebin.ca/165289

-- 
Regards,

Jason Lee
jlee at omegaserv.com

On 9/9/06, Jason Lee <jason.m.lee at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry about that. I thought I had the right core dump. I retried again and
> the output from bt and bt full is at http://pastebin.ca/165289
> It took 1min 50seconds of nothing but distortion before asterisk
> segfaulted
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Jason
>
>
> On 9/9/06, Daniel Pocock <daniel at readytechnology.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Jason Lee wrote:
> >
> > > I recompiled with debuging options...
> > >
> > > both bt and btfull outputs http://pastebin.ca/165250
> > > Before I recompiled it gave me a second of audio then I got nothing
> > but
> > > distortion for 5 seconds then asterisk would crash.
> > > I retested after compiling it with just a call between two local
> > > devices one
> > > using ulaw and the other using g729 and I'm getting nothing but
> > > distortion.
> > > I then tried calling music on hold and it took 3 minutes to crash the
> > > whole
> > > time I got nothing but distortion.
> > >
> > This suggests that someone/something gave the command `stop now'
> >
> > Can you send the backtrace from a segfault?
> >
> > >
> > > On 9/9/06, Daniel Pocock < daniel at readytechnology.co.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Jason Lee wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > I was testing the intel based G729 codec on SVN-trunk-r42453
> > following
> > >> > the
> > >> > new instructions for compiling with SVN trunk and it in preliminary
> > >> > tests it
> > >> > works ok for some calls but I found when one end of the call is an
> > IVR
> > >> or
> > >> > Music On Hold the sound gets all distorted and asterisk segfaults.
> > You
> > >> > can
> > >> > view the backtrace at http://pastebin.ca/165220
> > >> >
> > >> > Any assistance on this would be appreciated.
> > >> >
> > >> Have you compiled with debugging symbols instead of CPU optimization?
> > >>
> > >> Can you type `bt' after the segfault, to give us some more detail?
> > >>
> > >> How long into the call does this happen?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> >_______________________________________________
> > >> >--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> > >> >
> > >> >asterisk-users mailing list
> > >> >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > >> >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> > >>
> > >> asterisk-users mailing list
> > >> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > >>     http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> > >
> > >asterisk-users mailing list
> > >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> >
> > asterisk-users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060914/7d4c31e2/attachment.htm