[asterisk-users] Asterisk Realtime Arch - static or realtime?
benjamin.jacob at masconit.com
Mon Sep 11 05:16:33 MST 2006
>Benjamin Jacob wrote:
>>Wanted to know your experiences, if you've worked with Asterisk Realtime
>>Which one do you prefer, static or realtime?
>>I personaly think, the static architecture is a better solution, cuz, in
>>the realtime config, to check the dialplan(n hence the sql database) for
>>each and every call, will be expensive. With the static architecture,
>>you reload only when required(which practicaly will not be happening too
>>Care to share your experiences?
>>--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>>asterisk-users mailing list
>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>Personally, I use realtime for a LOT of the configuration and whatnot,
>but I don't touch the dialplan with RT. That being said, I'm personally
>fairly happy with the realtime support.
>Recent Trunk of both Asterisk and MySQL addons, large AEL2 dialplan,
>primarily SIP system.
So you are using the flat file extensions.conf for your dialplans??
If so, isn't it a pain to keep editing that file, when the need arises?
I too liked Realtime, for sip friends etc.
More information about the asterisk-users