[asterisk-users] Polycoms, Attended Transfer and Canreinvite = yes

[Rich Adamson]

The svn branch-1.2 is very stable, probably more stable then the rpms 
and other distro's out there, as fixes are applied when problems are 
identified and corrected. Sometime later, the svn branch-1.2 is used to 
create packages.


Kevin Smith wrote:
> Well personally I am just glad I wasn't the only one seeing the problem. 
> As much as I don't like the place 100% of the blame on something unless 
> I fully know what is  going on, in this case Asterisk, but I couldn't 
> see any solution but a bug.
> 
> Personally I wouldn't mind testing out the branch, but I know my boss, 
> isn't so trusting. How stable are the SVN branches, at least in terms of 
> justification for taking the system down to install it? Or is there an 
> easier way to test?
> 
> Thanks,
> Kevin
> 
> 
> Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>> ----- Richard Scobie <r.scobie at clear.net.nz> wrote:
>>   
>>> Dave Fullerton wrote:
>>>     
>>>> I just verified it here as well. Running Asterisk 1.2.11 and two
>>>>       
>>> polycom 
>>>
>>> I'll throw in a "me too" here, with the addition that it also occurs 
>>> with "canreinvite=no".
>>>     
>>
>> There were multiple problems in this area, introduced since Asterisk 1.2.9 was released. We believe that with today's commits in SVN branch-1.2 they are cured, so it would help us greatly if could download SVN branch-1.2 and try it out on your system to see if it solves your issue.
>>
>> I apologize for how this crept into the code base... it should not have happened, and we are taking steps to ensure that future changes in the release branch don't cause regressions like this.
>>
>>   
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users