[asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the "asterisk-users" mailing list

[Douglas Garstang]

I think that limit was increased in 1.6.6 or 1.6.7.

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: C F [mailto:shmaltz at gmail.com] 
	Sent: Tue 10/10/2006 6:57 PM 
	To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
	Cc: 
	Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the "asterisk-users" mailing list
	
	

	On 10/10/06, Eric ManxPower Wieling <eric at fnords.org> wrote:
	> What I don't understand is why people MUST use the 2.0.x firmware.
	
	I believe it's because the limit of how many can be monitored at once,
	someone correct me if I'm wrong.
	
	>
	> Jessee J Holmes wrote:
	> > A few of our technical support staff here at Atacomm are currently
	> > working on this issue with Polycom, Digium and one of our customer's
	> > (who posted in here earlier this week).
	> >
	> > There are some major differences from the 1.x.x firmware and the 2.01
	> > firmware. Obviously, many on here, voip-info.org, and all over the
	> > Internet have reported troubles where their presence feature that stops
	> > working after they upgrade their Polycom phones to firmware revision
	> > 2.0.1 when the phones are configured with an Asterisk system. A couple
	> > new things have been added to the .cfg files that MUST now be set in
	> > order for presence to work again with an Asterisk system.
	> >
	> > In the sip.cfg file:
	> >
	> > feature feature.1.name="presence" feature.1.enabled="1"
	> >
	> > In the phone[mac].cfg file:
	> >
	> > <attendant attendant.uri="user_112 at password_112" attendant.reg=""/>
	> >
	> >
	> > However, there are still confirmed problems with this setup (i.e. LEDs
	> > not working), which Polycom and ourselves are currently testing in our
	> > labs trying to fix. The reasoning for this is Digium doesn't seem to
	> > follow the "standards" for presence support and are currently working to
	> > change this functionality within Asterisk. Polycom designed their
	> > phones, and specifically their firmware, to work with the "standards"
	> > (more specifically, the Microsoft LCS - Live Communications Server).
	> >
	> > This issue has been reported on multiple instances to Polycom, Digium,
	> > and ourselves; but, no real resolution is completed yet. We'll continue
	> > working on this issue within our labs and post an official answer when
	> > one is available.
	> >
	> > Sorry for the bit of bad news, if anyone is willing to contribute
	> > working / half working code, we'd be more than happy to look at it and
	> > work with Polycom and Digium on getting this fixed for everyone AS
	> _______________________________________________
	> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
	>
	> asterisk-users mailing list
	> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
	>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
	>
	_______________________________________________
	--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
	
	asterisk-users mailing list
	To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
	   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users