[asterisk-users] cisco 2600

[Tijl Van den Broeck]

Great,

I've been testing it for the last few days. Everything works fine
except the following:

Cisco7940 (SIP firmware) --> Asterisk --> C2600 --> POTS phone

The Cisco phone can hear the POTS phone, but the POTS phone cannot
hear the Cisco phone. If the call is set up the other way round:
Cisco7940 (SIP firmware) <-- Asterisk <-- C2600 <-- POTS phone, it works fine.

Asterisk is allows only alaw & ulaw. And as I see in the asterisk
debug console, it doesn't conflict with the allowed codecs from the
C2600 and it processes the call without problems.

Relevant cisco config:
voice-port 1/0/0
 echo-cancel coverage 32
 no vad
 compand-type a-law
 cptone BE
 description line connected to isdn nr  xxxx
 bearer-cap Speech
!
dial-peer voice 5000 voip
 description forward 3485 to asterisk server
 destination-pattern 3485
 session protocol sipv2
 session target dns:asterisk
 session transport udp
 dtmf-relay rtp-nte
 codec g711alaw
!
dial-peer voice 500 pots
 destination-pattern 9T
 port 1/0/0
!

Does anyone have an idea what I'm missing here?

greetings

Tijl Van den Broeck



On 10/2/06, Idris AVCI <idris.avci at vodatech.com.tr> wrote:
> We've been using cisco 2600 gateways with asterisk for a year and
> everything works fine. IOS 12.2 is installed in gateways.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tijl Van den Broeck [mailto:subspawn at gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 10:30 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] cisco 2600
>
> I've got the same question actually.
> We're looking to replace CCM with * (finally.. it took me ages to
> convince that * is way better), but we've got cisco 1700 & 2600
> gateway's for the CCM in our remote offices that would have to be used
> by SIP with * now.
> Did anyone ever encounter or set up such an environment? Is it viable
> or should I go for a centralised setup in the head office straight
> away.
>
> greets
>
> Tijl Van den Broeck
>
> On 8/5/06, FaberK <f.faberk at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > does anybody used cisco 2600 as * gateway with E1?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > --
> > .:FaberK:.
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> >
> > asterisk-users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>