[asterisk-users] extensions.conf strangeness

[Marco Mouta]

 [invalid]
> exten => _X!,1,Answer()
> exten => _X!,2,Background(pbx-invalid)

Are you sure that your invalid context is correctly written?

I've never heard about this pattern match _X!
As far as i know the wild card is the "."
So your invalid context should be:

[invalid]
exten => _X.,1,Answer()
exten => _X.,2,Background(pbx-invalid)

This may be the cause....

Hope it helps.


On 9/29/06, Brian Candler <B.Candler at pobox.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 07:49:00PM +0200, Michael Neuhauser wrote:
> > The order of include statements is important in 1.2, I don't know if
> > this still holds for trunk/1.4. Could you please try to include the
> > 'invalid' context as the last one (i.e., AFTER "include => test", not
> > before) in both internal and from-sip and then test again?
>
> Yes, this works - both contexts now behave the same.
>
> But what I don't understand is, why it worked in one context but not in
> the
> other, when both just included the same four other contexts in the same
> order. Is the context merging non-deterministic? Or is it somehow
> sensitive
> to whether the incoming call came from zaptel or SIP?
>
> Regards,
>
> Brian.
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>



-- 
Com os melhores cumprimentos,

Marco Mouta
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061001/a091febe/attachment.htm