[asterisk-users] Vonage uses Cisco

[Matthew Rubenstein]

	That PR page quotes Vonage VP saying

"Our SIP-through-Network Address Translation [NAT] technology is unique
in the industry," says Babu. "Cisco helped us solve many of the
technical and business challenges of bringing this unique service to
market."

	What do you think Vonage SIPoNAT does that other Cisco customers don't
get? That we can't do with Asterisk outside the NAT and SIP softphones
(like X-lite)? That we can't do with IAX? Finally, does Cisco offer any
special features for using IAX with Asterisk?


On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 03:53 -0700,
asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com wrote:
> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:24:42 -0600
> From: "Curt Shaffer" <cshaffer at gmail.com>
> Subject: [asterisk-users] Vonage uses Cisco
> To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'"
>         <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Message-ID: <020e01c70c5b$cecae870$031b10ac at betsy>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
> 
> I have read different posts over the months wondering who Vonage uses
> for
> their VoIP technologies. I stumbled across this article (although it's
> from
> 2002, I think) that suggests strongly that they use Cisco. There is no
> telling what they might use in conjunction with this but this should
> clear
> some of the conjecture.
> 
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk701/technologies_case_study09186a008
> 00b559e.shtml
> 
> Curt 
-- 

(C) Matthew Rubenstein