[asterisk-users] Re: 900 rules

Steven asterisk at tescogroup.com
Tue Nov 14 09:23:24 MST 2006


exten => _91900NXXXXXX,1,Playback(the-number-u-dialed)
exten => _91900NXXXXXX,n,Playback(has)
exten => _91900NXXXXXX,n,Playback(a-connect-charge)
exten => _91900NXXXXXX,n,Playback(sorry-cant-let-you-do-that2)
exten => _91900NXXXXXX,n,Busy()

exten => _9NXX976XXXX,1,Playback(the-number-u-dialed)
exten => _9NXX976XXXX,n,Playback(has)
exten => _9NXX976XXXX,n,Playback(a-connect-charge)
exten => _9NXX976XXXX,n,Playback(sorry-cant-let-you-do-that2)
exten => _9NXX976XXXX,n,Busy()

-- 
-- 
Steven

http://www.glimasoutheast.org



"Eric "ManxPower" Wieling" <eric at fnords.org> wrote in message news:4559D4E6.30401 at fnords.org...
> Doug Crompton wrote:
>> I had a 19xx rule in asterisk and realized when I was trying to dial an
>> area code 978 in MA that that was not a good idea. Is there a more defined
>> rule for 900 space of non pay vs. pay codes?
>
> _1900NXXXXXX
> _NXX976XXXX
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 





More information about the asterisk-users mailing list