[asterisk-users] Callmanager 3.3(5) and Asterisk with ooh323

[Dan Austin]

Pavel wrote:
> seems that my issue with ooh323 not recognizing dtmf setting from peer

> definition is, that peer/user was not matched on incomming call from 
> callmanager to ooh323, because ooh323 matches user/peer according to 
> incomming h323id (what is "caller id name" from callmanager, i.e. if
my
> user/friend is defined as [Pavel Jezek] and I'm calling from
callmanager
> phone with caller id name Pavel Jezek, ooh323 successfully matches
ooh323
> peer (or better say type=user or friend). this matching behaviour is 
> quite useless in examples, when I would like to call to ooh323 from
any 
> ip phone behind callmanager....
> so in my scenario, I put dtmf setting under [general] and it works,
> but, imho, will be better, if ooh323 wil match according IP adres of 
> incomming call, instead of incomming h323id
Yup.  This is a known issue.  I presented a patch to fallback to
matching
on IP address if no other match is made.

There is/was a discussion on the ooh323-dev list about this and someone
else posted the same basic patch, but to date it has not been 'adopted'.


> .... but, I have another issue - with caller id:
> when calling from asterisk to callmanager (using ooh323), caller id 
> number is not passed to ip phone behind callmanager (I only see caller

> id name, not caller id number) it's curious, because from
tcpdump/Wireshark
> analysis - caller id number is present, so maybe "calling
presentation" is
> wrong set?

> from Wireshark (when calling from asterisk line 324, this info is not 
> displayed on phone behind callmager):

> Calling party number: '324'
> .... ..01 = Screening indicator: User-provided, verified and passed
(0x01)
> .01. .... = Presentation indicator: Presentation restricted (0x01)


Not sure on this one.  I do not normally place calls from Asterisk to 
CCM, we use Asterisk exclusively for conferencing, so I focus on getting
CCM calls into Asterisk.

Dan