回覆: [asterisk-users] Need help choosing cards that support detailHangup Cause

[King Ho]

How about T1?  or BRI?  I think BRI is just a single channel version of PRI,
right?

Thanks.

King

-----原始郵件-----
寄件者: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] 代理 C F
寄件日期: Sunday, 5 November, 2006 12:51
收件者: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
主旨: Re: [asterisk-users] Need help choosing cards that support
detailHangup Cause

Analog has no way of doing that, unless you listen to the recorded
message and your provider plays the right message for the right cause.
A PRI will give you the cause.

On 11/4/06, King Ho <kingho at completesolution.com.hk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to decide on which card to buy for a project where we need to
be
> able to log the reasons for failed calls.
>
> For example, if the number dialed is not valid anymore, like the client
has
> changed phone number and decommissioned the old number, we need Asterisk
to
> return a cause of AST_CAUSE_UNALLOCATED.
>
> Do we need to go T1/E1 (like the TE110P), BRI (like the B410P) or will
> analog cards like the TDM2400 with FXO ports be able to do it?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> King
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users