[Asterisk-Users] why a perfectly fine iax2 host becomes UNREA CHABLE?

[Andrew Kohlsmith]

On Thursday 04 May 2006 18:44, Colin Anderson wrote:
> Ah, true dat. However, if quality was crappy believe me my users would let
> me know. They are salespeople and wholly intolerant of anything that keeps
> them from yipping on the phone. I also run exactly the same rig at my house
> backhauled to our main Asterisk box to force me to eat my own dog food, and

:-)  I do the *exact* same thing, and for the same reasons.  :-)

> time. The only time I get chop is when I use my cordless to the TDM400:
> Cordless > TDM400 > * > IAX2 > * > PRI. Salespeople keep asking for
> cordless phones, but I keep telling them forget it. Cordless to an FXS to
> IAX over the Internet is just begging for trouble.

I don't have any trouble with my cordless phone to a TDM400, but there could 
be a wealth of factors playing into the chop you're seeing, as I'm sure 
you're aware.  I had a *really* bad digital cordless phone that I actually 
sent to Digium to help them figure out WHY this particular phone hated their 
FXS ports so badly, but I don't think I'd ever heard back from them.  I've 
never had another phone act that way though.  (Panasonic digital cordless, I 
have another one from Panasonic and it works perfectly fine.)

-A.

> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users