[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk with SuSe 10

Lee Archer lee.archer at pentagon-systems.com
Tue May 2 00:37:27 MST 2006


I downloaded the source and built it from that.  SuSE10 comes with a
version of asterisk 1.0.X on the DVD.

Regards

Lee 

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Yu Safin
Sent: 01 May 2006 16:31
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk with SuSe 10

On 1/24/06, Lee Archer <lee.archer at pentagon-systems.com> wrote:
> Thanks, I've got it running on my test box but didn't know if there 
> was any global objection to using it.  I've had a few funnies with it 
> but that might be down to Supermicro and P4's with the EM64T thing.
>
> Regards
>
> Lee
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ben 
> Klang
> Sent: 24 January 2006 15:49
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk with SuSe 10
>
> On Tuesday 24 January 2006 09:26, Lee Archer wrote:
> > Has anyone had any experience with the Asterisk on a SuSe 10
platform?
> > I'm currently using FC3 but because we use SuSe within other parts 
> > of the business I'm being pushed to changed the OS.
> Just about all of my production Asterisk servers are on SuSE 9.3.  My 
> development and demo boxes are SuSE 10.  Both run great.  I do however

> usually tweak the RPM that came with it to add in a few patches.  If 
> you are comfortable with running Asterisk 1.0.9 then the RPM works 
> very well.  SuSE always seems to really think things through when they

> package applications.
>
> For running something newer than Asterisk 1.0.9 SuSE 10 is also works 
> fine.
> For your own sanity you'll want to not install/uninstall the SuSE 
> Asterisk RPMs.  One possible gotcha: be careful of possibly 
> conflicting kernel modules in /lib/modules/`uname -r`/extra as the 
> Zaptel drivers are not part of any Asterisk package but rather the 
> kernel.  The zaptel compile from source installs modules to 
> /lib/modules/`uname -r`/misc so you'll want to delete the files in 
> extra.  You'll also have to remember that each time you update the
kernel RPM.
>
> Hope that helps.  The bottom line from me is Thumbs Up.
>
> /BAK/
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
did you have to install asterisk from source or from rpm?
I have installed asterisk under RH and I am switching over to SuSE OSS
10.0.  I could not find the "rpm" for asterisk.  My searches show that
the rpm is available for the commercial version of SuSE.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


###########################################

This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list